What does an L.A. Superior Court judge do?
Superior Court judges oversee trials across all of L.A. County. There are more than 400 of them in the court system. These trials cover everything having to do with state and local laws, including family law (such as child custody and divorces), contract disputes, thefts, felony murder, probate (distributing a person’s possessions after they die) and small claims.
A judge’s job is to act as court referee:
- making sure all sides are abiding by the proper rules
- hearing arguments
- handing down rulings based on the evidence and their interpretation of the law
If the law is very clear on a given issue, a judge has to stick to it regardless of how they personally feel. In other cases, laws may be ambiguous, and that’s when a judge has to issue their own interpretation of the law. Judges also have a fair amount of discretion when it comes to handing down penalties, such as the length of a sentence for a criminal conviction or the payment sum for a civil case. That's where it starts to really matter who is in the seat.
Make It Make Sense: Election 2024 Edition
Superior Court judges serve six-year terms, but they don’t always have to face reelection when that time is up. They’ll only appear on your ballot if someone challenges their seat at the end of their term — and even then, sometimes that will result in a dozen or more seats up for election in a given year. Judges who go unchallenged automatically get reelected into their next term and never appear on the ballot at all.
You might recognize their work from …
Your traffic ticket dispute. Or your child custody case. Or that time you served on a jury. If you’ve never had to interact with the court system, you’ve definitely heard of a case the L.A. Superior Court has handled: think Britney Spears’ conservatorship, rapper Tory Lanez’s trial for shooting Megan Thee Stallion, or the O.J. Simpson trial.
What should I consider in a candidate?
-
City of Los Angeles
- City Council: Vote for districts 2, 10 and 14.
- Charter Amendment ER: A package of ethics reforms designed to fight corruption at City Hall. Plus: Charter Amendments DD, FF, HH and II.
L.A. County
- Board of Supervisors: Measure G would dramatically overhaul county government.
- District Attorney: Criminal justice reform, or more law-and-order justice?
- LA Unified school board: Voters are also deciding on a $9 billion facilities bond and a redistricting measure.
- School district measures: Schools have a lot of repair needs.
- Superior Court judges: Plus: Tips to make sure you're putting right person on the bench.
Statewide races
- Whoa! There are 10 propositions on the ballot. Here's your cheat sheet to Props. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36.
Jump to the full Voter Game Plan for dozens more races ▶
Evaluating judicial candidates is notoriously hard. There can be dozens of them in a given election, and since many candidates are wary of politicizing judgeships, they don’t spend a lot of money on campaign advertising, which makes it hard to find out who they are or what they stand for. Plus, these are nonpartisan seats, so you don’t have the option of just voting for candidates who identify as a member of the party with whom you’re registered.
This is really not an easy task for the average voter, but there are a few pieces of information you can look at to help with your decision.
Here are some tips based on advice we previously received from Judge Stuart Rice, an L.A. Superior Court judge and a past president of the California Judges Association (note that he is not up for reelection):
Look at the L.A. County Bar Association's ratings: The L.A. County Bar Association (LACBA) is the main professional association for L.A.’s legal community. During every election, LACBA undertakes a lengthy evaluation process for each judicial candidate. We include the LACBA ratings in our guide because they can be one of the only ways for a voter without a legal background to assess whether an L.A. County Superior Court Judge candidate is qualified for the bench. These ratings are the opinion of a private, volunteer membership group unaffiliated with the state bar, and the committee faced allegations of bias in the 2024 primary. Other groups may find candidates as more or less qualified.
With LACBA, candidates fill out questionnaires and do in-person interviews with an evaluation committee, and have to submit a list of 75 lawyers or judges who can act as personal references. The committee follows up with each one and then gives candidates one of four ratings: Exceptionally Well Qualified, Well Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. If you don’t know where to start when evaluating judicial candidates, these ratings can help — they're included below in the candidate information.
“The number one quality a judge needs is an ability to work with people,” Judge Rice said. “And you need the ability to stay calm, to listen to all kinds of people, to have what I call a proper judicial demeanor.” This is one reason LACBA ratings can be useful for evaluating a candidate — they’re supposed to take temperament and personality into account in addition to legal ability. Another caveat, however, is that these evaluations don’t tell you exactly why the committee gave a candidate a particular rating unless someone declined to participate.
Check out endorsements: These are nonpartisan seats, but you’ll still see endorsements from newspapers, politicians and issue-based organizations, just like any political contest. If there’s an organization you trust, their endorsement might tip the scales for you.
Consider candidates’ experience: The only requirement for being a judge is to be authorized to practice law in California (usually by passing the bar exam), or to have already served as a judge for 10 years in California. That means you might find a wide range of legal experience among candidates. If they were a judge before, or have significant trial experience, that’s a big clue as to how prepared they may be for the job on Day 1. Having a history as a prosecutor or defense attorney can also tell you they’ve had a lot of experience in court, and give you an idea of their potential approach to criminal justice issues.
Here are some common job titles you may see on the ballot:
- Superior Court commissioner: Someone hired by court judges to do lower-level judicial work, such as traffic violation hearings or small claims. “Once chosen as a commissioner, you are already doing the job as a judge,” said Rice (who himself started his career as a Superior Court commissioner).
- Deputy district attorney: A prosecutor who works for the county district attorney’s office, representing the government in felony and misdemeanor cases.
- Deputy county counsel: An attorney who works for the county counsel’s office, giving legal advice to different departments and representing the county in various litigation issues.
- Public defender: A defense attorney employed by the government to represent defendants accused of crimes who can’t afford private lawyers.
- City attorney: An attorney who handles lawsuits on behalf of a city government. In places like L.A., deputy city attorneys also act as prosecutors for misdemeanors.
- Attorney, attorney at law, counselor at law, or lawyer: These are general titles used to describe anyone authorized to practice law, whether they’re a law professor, private defense attorney, in-house counsel at a company, or someone who’s passed the bar exam but isn’t actually working as a lawyer. You’ll likely have to dig a bit more to find out the candidate’s actual work experience.
Fun fact: Until recently, judicial candidates would frequently use their job titles on the ballot as a campaign marketing tool. Candidates would list themselves as “violent crimes prosecutor,” “child molestation prosecutor,” or “domestic violence attorney” to catch voters’ eye — and the tactic largely worked. A reform bill passed in 2017 put an end to that practice, so now you see much more neutral titles like the ones above. (That doesn’t necessarily stop candidates from finding other ways to finesse their appearance on the ballot — one legally changed his first name to “Judge” in the 2020 elections, despite not being an actual sitting judge.)
Look at a candidate’s website: If a candidate doesn’t even bother having a website or online presence where you can learn more about them, that’s a signal they may not be running a serious campaign, Rice said. Campaign websites can also give you more detailed information about a candidate’s background, mission and experience.
Voters also have the opportunity to decide between two public defender and district attorney match-ups on Election Day.
Public defenders are employed by the government to represent people who have been accused of crimes and can’t afford a private lawyer. Experts argue that public defenders can offer a well-rounded perspective because they’ve spent more time defending everyday people in a justice system that’s long had racial and ethnic disparities. That said, there tends to be a bias toward putting prosecutors and law-and-order types into the judge’s seat.
Why do we even vote for judges?
In short, because we have for a long time and because proposals to stop electing judges haven’t succeeded.
If you’re not totally comfortable with the idea of electing judges, you’re not alone. Lots of people have questioned whether it’s a good idea to elect our judiciary — does it cause judges to worry more about being popular instead of making the right decisions in cases? Some critics also point to L.A.’s 2006 judicial elections, in which a well-respected sitting judge who had served on the court for over 20 years unexpectedly lost her seat to a bagel shop owner with much less legal experience who spent way more money on campaign advertising.
The candidates
With all the above in mind, here is our judges guide. It includes all 10 candidates vying for the five remaining seats. Each profile has the candidate's job, campaign website, a link to their full list of endorsements, and the L.A. County Bar Association ratings when applicable (read about LACBA's methodology here).
Office No. 39
George A. Turner Jr.
Deputy Public Defender
Website: GeorgeATurner4Judge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the Defenders of Justice slate and on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Qualified
Steve Napolitano,
Attorney/Councilmember, Manhattan Beach
Website: SteveNapolitano.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Qualified
Office No. 48
Ericka J. Wiley
Deputy Public Defender
Website: WileyForJudge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the Defenders of Justice slate and on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Qualified
Renee Rose
Deputy District Attorney
Website: ReneeRoseForJudge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Well Qualified
Office No. 97
Sharon Ransom
Deputy District Attorney
Website: SharonRansomForJudge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Well Qualified
La Shae Henderson
Deputy Public Defender
Website: Lashae4Judge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate's website
LACBA Rating: Qualified
Office No. 135
Steven Yee Mac
Deputy District Attorney
Website: StevenMacForJudge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Well Qualified
Georgia Huerta
Deputy District Attorney
Website: GeorgiaHuertaForJudge2024.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Well Qualified
Office No. 137
Luz E. Herrera
Attorney/Law Professor
Website: LuzHerrera.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Qualified
Tracey M. Blount
Senior Deputy County Counsel
Website: TraceyBlountForJudge.com
Endorsements: See the list on the candidate’s website
LACBA Rating: Well Qualified
More reading
- How courts work (Judicial Council of California): Helpful background on the state court system.
- Let a judge help you judge the L.A. Superior Court candidates (LAist): Listen to our full 2018 interview with Judge Stuart Rice.
- When (and why) we vote for judges (KCET): A primer on why we’re even doing all of this.
- Why do so few public defenders become judges? (NPR): An exploration into the possible biases against public defenders as capable judges.
- Metropolitan News-Enterprise: A daily L.A. newspaper focused on local legal news and the play-by-play of judicial politics.
Before you read more, we wanted to take a moment to tell you about our mission here at LAist, and why we're so dedicated to helping you get ready to vote.
In the lead-up to this important election, our hard-working reporters and editors spent hundreds and hundreds of hours researching and writing these detailed guides and fact-based resources. We invested that time because we're here to help you vote confidently and make your community a better place.
But we cannot do this essential work without your help. We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
At a time when the need for local journalism has never been greater, many newsrooms are facing cutbacks, including LAist. Member support — your support — is what will sustain a free press in Southern California.
LAist’s mission is to be here for you, so please be here for us now with a donation to power our trusted local reporting. Step up right now and make the choice to give. Because that’s exactly what it is — a choice. It's choice with consequences. If readers do not choose to step up and donate, the future of fact-based news in Southern California will not be as strong.
No matter what happens in the world, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust.
Thank you for your generous support.
Sincerely,
-
(she/her)